Tuesday, November 30, 2021

 Michelle Highsmith

Jennifer Atkins-Gordeeva

English Comp II-66W

1 December  2021

Polished Research

Injuries in Manufacturing Industry and Companies should be held Responsible

         Manufacturing Companies should be held responsible for accidents, injuries, and illness that occur in their plants. I strongly feel that a company has a duty to protect their employees' safety. When an employee is injured or becomes ill due to a safety violation the Manufacturing Company should pay and be held accountable for shortcomings. I have personally experienced a safety injury, and my finger was partially amputated. It was due to the fact that the machine that I operated on was not up to part before I was placed on the equipment. May 5, 2020 I was asked to wield parts on a  machine that did not have safety guards, and did not have a shut off valve. I was not properly trained on the equipment before being placed on the machine, and I wasn’t given the correct PPE (personal protective equipment).

  Yes, I feel that manufacturing industries should be held responsible for injuries.  Due to lack of safety equipment, not having the correct PPE (personal protective equipment) which is any safety equipment required to be used to perform designated tasks , nor giving employees proper training and other safety violations including not having proper employees safety guarding on their machines. Which in some cases may cause amputation, illness, and other extreme accidents.  Due to lack of safety issues and violations in the manufacturing industries employees have been severely hurt or became ill. In some instances, employees did not get adequate training, because their trainer was not properly trained, or just didn’t have the basic skills and knowledge on the equipment. Before they were asked to train another employee on the machine. In some cases, machines do not have proper guarding or no guarding at all. 

 Lockout/tagout which is a safety procedure for when working on dangerous equipment to de-energize the equipment at the disconnect with a lock and tag. Prior to working on the equipment, the only people who can restore energy to the system to prevent accidental injuries from unknowing coworkers. Lockout/tagout are important safety issues that some companies just don’t  seem to enforce enough. All operators should be trained on lockout/tagout. No employees should be running a machine without this basic knowledge. Chemical and electric training should always be given to all operators within the industry. Operators should be aware of the SOP and all PPE standards and where it is located. There should be a safety committee on each shift who are trained and knowledgeable of Safety protocols. If an employee feels that their safety is in jeopardy. The employee should refuse to operate the machine. If any Safety violation has been committed OSHA needs to be contacted.

Maul and Wallace states,” OSHA has been doing ongoing health regulations for over 30 years. Companies have been failing to report injuries, illness, and faulty equipment. Companies have large numbers of amputations, due to faulty equipment and not having the correct PPE (Safety Equipment) in place” (Maul, Gary P; Wallace, Darrell).  Maul and Wallace states,”The   largest number of amputations recorded over a 9 year period was among machine operators” (Maul, Gary P; Wallace, Darrell).

Yes, I can believe this, due to the fact that after my accident we had 3 more accidents basically of the same nature. My accident was a hand accident. Our company had 2 more smashed fingers incidents where people nearly had to get amputated. All the injured employees did not have adequate training or did not have the proper PPE. 

 Maul and Wallace states, “ The first step in this study is the identification of root causes of injuries  incidents. In preliminary investigations of OSHA documented injuries, the  root causes of most machinery related injuries appear to be one of the following:

* Failure to identify a hazard and not guard against it. *Improper design of a guard or safeguarding method.*Failure of employees to follow appropriate procedures.* Functional failure of a properly designed safeguard. *Deliberate disabling of a safeguard. Failure to identify a hazard is hard to comprehend in light of all of the attention focused on safety. There appears to be a lack of understanding of what makes something a hazard and a general lack of awareness of the  inherent dangers of that hazard. History has shown that if a hazard exists an injury will eventually occur” (Maul, Gary P; Wallace, Darrell). This proves my argument  that employers should make sure all employees are trained and equipped before operating any machines. If I had been properly trained, given the proper PPE, and had a machine with proper safety guards and shut off valve on it. I would not have had to go through an amputation, but due to the fact that the machine did not have any  safety guarding  and no shut off valve my hand was caught in the machine. I had to wait until it went through the cycle time before it opened up to release my hand. The machine was set at 450 degrees so it cauterized my finger.

The author Johnathan Karmel explains, “There are three basic danger zones that require safeguarding in some fashion, because of dangerous moving parts in all machines. The point of operation is where the work is performed on the material. It can involve cutting, sawing, shaping, boring or forming. Different mechanical motions and actions present hazards to a worker for gears, belts, saws, shearing, punch presses, and cutting teeth, among many more. Basically, any moving part is a hazard. To prevent an injury or death, safety rule number one is to prevent contact between the worker and the wrong machine. It is easier said than done, since workers have to be in close contact to operate and maintain their machines. Guards are the preferred method of protection” ( Karmel 129).  Safety guards on machines are so important. Safety guards help protect the employee and also the employer.   As a trainer I take every new employee on a tour and point out the safety guard, and how important it is not to go around safety guards, or up under a safety guard that has been placed in a work area.

Jonathan Karmel states, “Even  if appropriate guards are in place, maintenance and training are other critical components to a safe workplace. If a machine is not properly maintained, it can become a danger when, for example, electrical wiring and systems are frayed and exposed creating a hazard for electrocution. Workers must be trained in lock-out/ tag-out procedures, to prevent the sudden energizing of a machine during maintenance. Preventable manufacturing injuries and fatalities occur everyday” (Karmel 131). It is very important that each employee feels safe and secure in their work environment. No employee should have to come to work and worry about whether they may not go home in one piece. There should be trust in the company and it should not be broken due to unsafe environments.

Another big issue in the manufacturing companies is the issue with the turnover rate. Companies lose a lot of money due to the fact they can not keep workers. Foster Rinefort states, “The Bureau of Labor Statistics (1982) found that workers were approximately three times more likely to be hurt during their first month of employment than during their ninth month of employment and that workers under 25 years of age were 10 to 20 times more likely to sustain a work injury. This dearth of research suggested the need for a study investigating the relationship between these two variables -work injuries  and turnover”(Rinefort). At the company I work at, the turnover rate is ridiculous.  The fact that an employee does not feel safe in their work environment can cause the turnover rate to have a huge impact in the manufacturing companies.  Employees should never be put in an unsafe work environment, and feel like they do not have the right to voice their opinion. This was the case with me with my accident. The machine was having problems from the start. I had to call a molesetter to come and fix the machine, because it kept getting hung up. Which meant the machine wouldn't open up. I did not feel prepared nor comfortable operating the machine,  but I was scared to state that to the supervisor. I did not feel like I had a right to voice my opinion, and that is the case so many times with new employees. So, they make a decision to leave instead of causing confusion in their mindset. 

Blake states, “The  Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) says employers must identify workplace hazards and use engineering and administrative controls to remove the  hazards where possible. When those hazards cannot be eliminated, employees need Personal Protective Equipment  (PPE). The  OSHA standard addresses head, eye and face, hand, hearing and foot protection. The protection offered by the  PPE is the last line of defense against an injury. It becomes the front-line supervisors' responsibility to make sure the  employees are using/wearing it. If an OSHA inspector visits, the  employer can be fined for PPE violations. OSHA is now able to multiply any fines related to PPE violations by the  number of  your employees, rather than issuing one practicewise citation. So, it's important to know and understand your responsibilities as they relate to PPE”(Blake). As a trainer I should have known I didn't have the correct gloves on to be operating a machine with that force of heat, but the truth is at the time we did not even have the correct gloves  for the machine that I was operating. I have been a trainer for 3 years, and still was not properly trained for nor had the proper equipment. 

Nagele-Piazza states, “Fall Protection is such a big category because a lot of fatalities are due to falls—particularly in construction but also in general industry, '' said Ed Foulke, an attorney with Fisher Phillips in Atlanta and the former head of OSHA under George W. Bush. Employers are required to notify OSHA within eight hours of a fatality, which prompts a workplace  inspection”(Nagele-Piazza). Another indication of how important it is to protect the employees from trips and falls. Here is some research done by the author on falls and lockout/tagout with high the impact of safety violations.

Any of these violations in the manufacturing companies needs to be reported to OSHA. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration was established to ensure the safety of employees, so if any employee feels that they are in an unsafe work environment, the employee has gone through the proper channels. OSHA should be notified immediately there's a toll free number. You don't have to worry about losing your job, because as an employee the company has a duty to ensure safety to each and everyone of their employees. If the manufacturing companies will not  ensure your safety then they should be held accountable for their lack of duty to their employees safety. Here's the information for OHSA(Occupational Safety and Health Administration)   1 (800) 321-6742. They can help answer any questions you have regarding safety and procedures, and the line is open 24 hours and 7 days a week. 

  Manufacturing Companies should be held responsible for injuries due to safety violations in their plants. This would make companies think first about their employees' . Instead of getting just a slap on the hand. Not just a simple fine by OSHA, but if they got fined and had to take sole responsibility for their actions. Manufacturing companies would think twice before they allowed employees to operate  faulty machines without proper training and correct PPE. It's important that all employees feel safe in their working environment. It is a duty to keep employees safe companies should have procedures and protocol in place for any safety violations.

 Companies should hold their standards high in regards to safety. Safety should always come first no matter how much production needs to go out. Safety should be top priority, and if they will not ensure the proper protocols and procedures the companies need to be held responsible. Companies should not just be fined, but it should go further. Companies need to realize that employees' lives and health are important, that they are not just a number who can be replaced at will.    

Those who are in charge of Safety and the Protocol of the Manufacturing Companies need to do updates and research. Don't just wait until an accident happens and then go and pull every machine that dont have the correct safe guards or the proper equipment. But there should be a maintenance protocol check done weekly to ensure that every machine is running properly and has the correct safety equipment. Regarding railing, guards, lockout/tagout, and proper training for those who are operating the equipment. 

These are simple steps that should be followed to ensure that the employee is protected along with the employer, so if they don’t take care of their employees. Manufacturing Companies should be held accountable for every incident, accident, and health violation that occurs in their plants due to lack of responsibility to their employees. Manufacturing Companies have a duty to keep every employee safe.

Therefore, I strongly feel that manufacturing companies should be held responsible for injuries or illness that occur in their plants. An employee shouldn’t have to worry about their safety when they come to work. When it’s a duty for the employer to keep their machines and equipment safe. No employee should have to ponder over the fact that they may lose a limb or not be able to go home to their families. Due to upkeep equipment and safety violations,  I would like to say from my experience, which was horrible. I had my accident on May 5, 2020 around 2am. It was not 24 hours and I was contacted by the plant manager to come in to explain to the Safety Manager  what occurred.  When I got there I was told that I would have to remain at work and sort parts in a different department. Granted I had a cast on one arm and had gotten a tetanus shot in the other.  So, how would I be able to do that? Long story short:  I had the hospital  send a doctor note so I could leave. I had just had an accident in their company, and they were worried about parts when a week later I lost my partial finger.

This is a typical manufacturing company and how they think. Employees are just the little people who can be replaced, this is where they are wrong. If companies do not take care of their employees, how do they expect to stay in business? No little people, no product, it is just as simple as that. Yes, I feel like manufacturer companies should be held responsible for their neglect. If they start to have to pay for every accident and violation. Instead of getting little fines they would be more responsible. Shut the company down for a month or two, hit them where it hurts. Then maybe they will get a sense of responsibility. I just feel like paying someone's doctor bill and giving them a little money is not enough. Losing a limb or a life can never be replaced.

Manufacturing Companies should be held responsible for injuries and illness.





Work Cited


Blake, Marilyn A. “Personal Protection Equipment: The Last Line of Defense.” Rural Telecommunications; Washington Vol. 33 Iss 4, (Jul/Aug): 36, 38.

Karmel, Johnathan D. Dying to Work: Death and Injury in the American Workplace. Cornell University Press,  12-15-2017.

 Nagele-Piazza, Lisa. “Top 10 OSHA Violations for 2017: Fall protection, hazard communication, and scaffolding violations top the list again.” HRNews,Oct 16, 2017.

Maul, Gary P and Wallace, Darrell. “Manufacturing Injuries and the Need for Improvement”. IIE Annual Conference. Proceedings; Norcross (2006) 1-9.

Occupational Safety and Health Administration Home | Occupational Safety and Health Administration (osha.gov)

 Rinefort, Foster C; Van Fleet, David D. “Work Injuries and employee turnover.” American Business Review, Vol. 16, Iss. 2, Jun 1998, pp 9-13.


 Michelle Highsmith

English Comp II-66W

Jennifer Atkins-Gordeeva

1 November 2021

Argumentative Research Outline

Research Argument Outline

Injuries In Manufacturing Industry and Companies Should Be Held Responsible

Thesis: Manufacturing companies should be held reliable for accidents, injuries, and illness

that occur in their plants. Due to lack of safety equipment, not having the correct PPE, nor giving employees proper training, and other safety violations. Including not having the appropriate safety guards on their machine while employee’s operator. Which in some cases may cause amputation, illness, and other hazard accidents?

I.                    Employees Safety Training:

a.   Employee Training- Trainer should be knowledgeable of machine equipment, paperwork, and all other safety procedures PPE within the industry.

b.  PPE – correct safety glasses, gloves, shoes, garments, and helmets.

c.   Lockout/Tagout procedures- All Operators should be trained in this procedure.

d.  Chemical and Electricity training.

e.   Training in Safety procedures such as Tornado, Fire, or Hazard Road conditions.

II.                 Safety Committee:

a.   Employees, Supervisors and Leads, and Safety Coordinator- Each should have thorough knowledge in Safety Procedures.

b.  Record Safety injuries and illness throughout the year.

c.   SOP- Standard Operating Procedures- This explains activities and procedure to complete task in regulations with laws

III.              Introduction: Due to lack of Safety Issues and violation in the manufacturing industries employees have been severely hurt or became ill. For some instances employees did not getting adequate training, because their trainer was not properly trained, or just didn’t have the basic skills and knowledge on the equipment. Before they were asked to train another employee on the machine. In some cases, machines do not have proper guarding or none. Lockout/tagout are important safety issues that some companies just seem to enforce enough. All operators should be trained on lockout/tagout. No employees should be running a machine without this basic knowledge. Chemical and electric training should always be giving to all operators within the industry. Operators should be aware of the SOP and all PPE standards and where its located. There should be a safety committee on each shift who are trained and knowledgeable of Safety protocols. If employee feels that their safety is in jeopardy. The employee should refuse to operator the machine. If any Safety violation

has been committed OSHA needs to be contacted.

IV.              Conclusion:  Manufacturing Companies should be held responsible for injuries due to safety violations in their plants.

 

  

 


 The Quiz on the Letter from a Birmingham Jail

Quiz on Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.'s, "Letter from a Birmingham Jail."

Directions: Read pp. 423-441 in Composition Mix. Use the reading to respond to these questions. This is an open book quiz. Do not use outside sources to respond to the questions. This assignment is designed to help you understand rhetorical decisions that are made in arguments. After you complete this, you will make rhetorical decisions in your own argument on your own topic. This quiz is required.

1.                 Who is his audience? (There are at least two wrong answers: “everyone who reads it” and anything else that is too general.) Clergymen or Preachers who would read this to their congregation.

2.                 What is he trying to accomplish? (For instance: a change of opinion, a modification of knowledge) State it clearly. To promote nonviolent campaign

3.                 Why is it important for him to change the opinion, modify knowledge, etc., of the audience?

Change wouldn’t take place if violence would continue.

4.                 WhaWt will happen if the change or modification, etc., does not occur? This is King’s statement of the case. We will still be segregated

5.                 What reasons (logos) does Dr. King provide for his argument? List at least three and offer the page numbers in the chart below:

Reason

When he speaks about we waited for 340 years for our constitutional rights.

Page Number

430

When he speaks of nonviolence.

425

When he points out the purpose of our direct-action

427

 

 

 

6.                 Dr. King discusses reasons various audiences might oppose his claim. Find at least one place in which he does that and tell what page you found it on. He has built ethos there by establishing credibility. When he gives example using the moral and law of God

 

7.                 Dr. King also builds ethos by building common ground. Find at least one example of him building common ground with his audience. When he speak of the leadership of the bus protest in Alabama

8.                 Dr. King builds pathos, emotional connection, in many places. Find at least one place in which he does that and tell what page you found it on. When he describe the lynching and drownings of African americans.

9.                 Dr. King builds pathos, emotional connection, by his use of language. On page 428, paragraph 15, Dr. King includes a sentence that is more than 300 words long. Read that sentence out loud to yourself. Note how he uses repetition and rhythm as he offers examples. Content warning: this sentence includes multiple uses of at least one offensive racist term plus an offensive word that was not racist at the time. Write about how this sentence connected to you emotionally. This made me very upset just thinking about trying to explain to my children that they couldn’t attend a game, visit a museum, or either participate in various activities because of the color of their skin makes me extremely angry. Not being able to sit or go where they wanted to due to their skin. Being called out of their names due to the color of their skin. Yes, this mad me mad. I can’t even fathom how he or anyone can build up the words to try and justify the injustice.

 

 Michelle Highsmith

Jennifer Atkins-Gordeeva

English Comp II-66W

31 October 2021

Thesis for the Argumentative Research Essay

Injuries in Manufacturing Industry and Companies should be held Responsible

         Manufacturing Companies should be held responsible for accidents, injuries, and illness that occur in their plants. Due to lack of safety equipment, not having the correct PPE, nor giving employees proper training and other safety violations including not having proper guarding on their machines. Which in some cases  may cause amputation, illness, and other extreme accidents.  


 Michelle Highsmith

Jennifer Atkins-Gordeeva

English Comp II-66W

8 November 2021 Intro and Conclusion for the Argumentative Research Essay

Injuries in Manufacturing Industry and Companies should be held Responsible

         Manufacturing Companies should be held responsible for accidents, injuries, and illness that occur in their plants. Due to lack of safety equipment, not having the correct PPE, nor giving employees proper training and other safety violations including not having proper guarding on their machines. Which in some cases  may cause amputation, illness, and other extreme accidents.  Due to lack of Safety Issues and violation in the manufacturing industries employees have been severely hurt or became ill. For some instances employees did not get adequate training, because their trainer was not properly trained, or just didn’t have the basic skills and knowledge on the equipment. Before they were asked to train another employee on the machine. In some cases, machines do not have proper guarding or none. Lockout/tagout are important safety issues that some companies just seem to enforce enough. All operators should be trained on lockout/tagout. No employees should be running a machine without this basic knowledge. Chemical and electric training should always be given to all operators within the industry. Operators should be aware of the SOP and all PPE standards and where it is located. There should be a safety committee on each shift who are trained and knowledgeable of Safety protocols. If an employee feels that their safety is in jeopardy. The employee should refuse to operate the machine. If any Safety violation has been committed OSHA needs to be contacted.

        Conclusion:  Manufacturing Companies should be held responsible for injuries due to safety violations in their plants. This would make companies think first about their employees' safety. Instead of getting just a slap on the hand. Not just a simple fine by OSHA, but if they got fined and had to take sole responsibility for their actions. Manufacturing companies would think twice before they allowed employees to operate  faulty machines without proper training and correct PPE. 

  

 




Friday, November 5, 2021

 Michelle Highsmith

English Composition II

Jennifer Atkins-Gordeeva

October 12, 2021

This is the Annotated Bibliography for the argumentative essay research paper with 12 sources.

Annotated Bibliography

Maul, Gary P and Wallace, Darrell. “Manufacturing Injuries and the Need for Improvement”. IIE Annual Conference. Proceedings; Norcross (2006) 1-9.

ProQuest, https://www.proquest.com/docview/192453622/7BB5B0BF2FD44606PQ/17?accountid=39906

Maul and Wallace state that OSHA has been doing ongoing health regulations for over 30 years. Companies have been failing to report injuries, illness, and faulty equipment. Companies have large numbers of amputation, due to faulty equipment and not having the correct PPE (Safety Equipment) in place. Maul and Wallace states, “The largest number of amputations recorded over a 9 year period was among machine operators.” (Maul, Gary P; Wallace, Darrell) I find the source credible because it comes from OSHA FACTS, United States Safety and Health Administration. I plan on using this source because it explains a lot about the company's inability to concur with OSHA laws.

Chappell, Lindsey. “OSHA inspects supplier plants in the South: Federal Agents going to 2,900 factories over concerns on injuries, safety issues.” Automotive News, suppl. Traverse City Daily; Vol.21, Iss. 1, (Aug 5, 2014): S001.

ProQuest https://www.proquest.com/docview/1553429006/7BB5B0BF2FD44606PQ/47?accountid=39906

Chappell writes about OSHA enforcement programs in Atlanta reporting and enlarging the number of events from insufficient machine safety guards and protection from electrical shock. Chappell states, “Michigan auto parts plants recorded 6.3 OSHA incidents per 100 employees during the same period, according to Bureau of Statistics data. Mississippi does not report injury data.” (Chappell, Lindsey). I find this source credible because the author used valuable information from other sources to support her theories.

Trost, Cathy. “OSHA to Check Safety at More Firms In an Expansion of Inspection Policy.” Wall Street Journal, Eastern edition; New York, N.Y.[New York, N.Y.] .08 Jan 1986: 1

ProQuest https://www.proquest.com/docview/398016888/7BB5B0BF2FD44606PQ/53?accountid=39906

Trost writes about OSHA refocusing on manufacturing industries with the most high hazard injuries.  That OSHA will continue to do spot checks on companies this information was obtained in 1981.  I will use this source to key out points from 1981 until now in 2021.

 “Workplace Injuries and Illnesses in 2005.” Bureau of  Labor Statistic News. (Oct 19,2006)

ProQuest https://www.proquest.com/docview/2250416823/7BB5B0BF2FD44606PQ/24?accountid=39906

In this article the author states different cases in the workplaces such as in mining, agriculture, fishing, hunting, construction, manufacturing and numerous other workplaces. I plan to use this information from 2005 and compare it to the information in 2021. I find this source credible because it comes from the Bureau of Labor Statistic News.

Karmel, Johnathan D. Dying to Work: Death and Injury in the American Workplace. Cornell University Press,  12-15-2017.

ProQuest https://www.proquest.com/docview/2136047328/A1AF7965896D4BE6PQ/9?accountid=39906

In this book Karmel speaks out about the unsafe work conditions in the manufacturing industry along with other workplaces. The author explains,” Karmel’s examples are portraits of the lives and dreams cut short and reports of the workplace incidents that tragically changed the lives of everyone around them. Dying to Work includes incidents from industries and jobs that we do not commonly associate with injuries and fatalities and highlights the risks faced by workers who are hidden in plain view all around us.”(Karmel)

 Rinefort, Foster C; Van Fleet, David D. “Work Injuries and employee turnover.” American Business Review, Vol. 16, Iss. 2, Jun 1998, pp 9-13.

ProQuest https://www.proquest.com/docview/216313839/4043685F622D41FFPQ/97?accountid=39906

Rinefort gives information about the turnover rate in the manufacturing industry. Due to the large number of turnover rates, employees may not be getting proper training. Some of the information is over 20 years old, but it still holds credibility, because it explains why the turnover rate in the manufacturing companies has increased over the years. 

 Nagele-Piazza, Lisa. “Top 10 OSHA Violations for 2017: Fall protection, hazard communication, and scaffolding violations top the list again.” HRNews,Oct 16, 2017.

ProQuest https://www.proquest.com/docview/2023428708/98364C537E184A0FPQ/2?accountid=39906

Nagele-Piazza announces the top 10 OSHA most frequently cited workplace safety violations in the year of 2017. The author explains, “ Employers should make sure workers are familiar with the rules and understand that violations of the rules won't be tolerated. * Look at OSHA 300 logs (which employers use to record worksite injuries and illnesses) and conduct an incident analysis for each entry to figure out the root cause of the incidents and ways to eliminate future risks. * Perform an accident investigation and root cause analysis for  near misses as well”.(Piazza)

U.S. Newswire,“OSHA Reveals Top 10 Violations for Fiscal Year 2020: Violations from fiscal year 2019 remain….”01 Mar 2021.

ProQuest https://www.proquest.com/docview/2494331640/98364C537E184A0FPQ/10?accountid=39906

The author explains, "In a year that was defined by the ongoing pandemic, workplace safety became more important than ever," said Lorraine M. Martin, NSC president and CEO. "The OSHA Top 10 list reminds us why we must continue to focus on persistent safety risks as we navigate new challenges. These data help us pinpoint areas where we can improve so we can better prioritize workplace safety in the future world of work."

U.S. Newswire; “OSHA Reveals Top 10 Safety Violations for Fiscal Year 2021 at NSC Safety Congress & Expo: Falls remain top citation for 11th year in a row.” 12 Oct 2021.

The author explains,”Fall Protection (1926.501) remains at the top of the list for the 11th year in a row, followed by Respiratory Protection (1910.134) and Ladders (1926.1053). Hazard Communication, which spent the last several years at number two, moved to the fifth spot on this year's list.” This source has information containing the top 10 OSHA safety violations in 2021. I plan on using the number to support my argument for over the past years machine guarding, lockout tag, and proper training numbers have either increased or decreased.

PR Newswire;” Personal Protection Equipment in the Global Manufacturing Industry-Outlook and Trend.” 31 March 2014.

ProQuest https://www.proquest.com/docview/1536958750/5471EC7359584AC3PQ/1?accountid=39906

This source has information about the different styles and trends in the market of PPE in the manufacturing industry. I plan to use this source to discuss the importance of the PPE in the manufacturing industry. The author explains, “The manufacturing industry comprises a wide range of diverse sectors. The dynamics and the  nature of these sectors vary among each other and also from one region to another. In this study, an overview of opportunities for PPE is provided on an aggregate level. While there is a wide range of hazards and protection types that are common to general manufacturing, there are also specific hazards that are unique to some sectors that require different PPE products.”

Smith, Sandy. ”Lack of PPE among 33 OSHA Violations at A&B Foundry Machining.”  EHS Today,Jun 11, 2013.

ProQuest https://www.proquest.com/docview/1366563182/5D5772C751CE40A0PQ/5?accountid=39906

Smith writes in this article the repeated violation of chemical hazard training that caused injuries in the workplace, and 33 health and safety violations. I find this information extremely incredible because of the vital information the author used.

Blake, Marilyn A. “Personal Protection Equipment: The Last Line of Defense.” Rural Telecommunications; Washington Vol. 33 Iss 4, (Jul/Aug): 36, 38.

ProQuest https://www.proquest.com/docview/1545631931/5D5772C751CE40A0PQ/8?accountid=39906

Blake describes in this article the importance of PPE. The importance of wearing, cleaning and caring for the PPE. The importance of the proper training in all these areas. I plan to use this information by explaining the importance of using PPE and not using to correct protection.

 

US Fed News Service, Including US State News Washington, D.C. “OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION CITES HOIST LIFTRUCK MFG. WITH $235,800 FOR REPEAT SAFETY VIOLATIONS AT BEDFORD PARK,TRUCK MANUFACTURING CENTER.” 06 Aug 3013.

ProQuest https://www.proquest.com/docview/1417817607/88816A7A7F074698PQ/10?accountid=39906

This source cites that the employer repeatedly violated safety violation by failing to provide employees with safety equipment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


  Jennifer Atkins-Gordeeva  Michelle Highsmith Final Reflections Projects and Their Processes There were three projects, the first was a p...